Dan Pfeifer believes the entire universe owes Ambassador Susan Rice an apology. Why; because she is, as he is, Obama’s tool and a humble Gunga Din to the administration?
Pfeifer’s dumber than a set of white wingtips in a hog pen. This past Sunday he rode the same circuit Rice followed when she touted the administration lies the Benghazi attacks were predicated on a sloppily produced video featured on YouTube. The video made fun of Mohammed and Allah. Rice alleged it was so heinous an act it incited “spontaneous demonstrations” and an all-out slaughter of four Americans.
In an attempt to divert attention from the fact the lies started higher up on the food-chain than at the snack-bar Susan Rice’s position maintains as United Nations Ambassador, Pfeifer stared dully into the cameras and mouthed the inanities even he appeared to find ludicrous as they tumbled out of his slack jaws.
When asked by George Stephanopoulis, liberal hatchet man sequestered at ABC, what Republicans should apologize for, Pfeifer said: “For accusing her of misleading the country, for saying that she didn’t - that somehow she was involved in some sort of political whitewash of what happened there. What she said was what the intelligence community believed at the time. And when we got further information, we told the American people what that was. That’s how people know what happened here."
If she didn’t mislead the country, what exactly did she do Dan? Should she be absolved of guilt because she merely parroted what she was told by leadership in the State Department? Or, should she get a pass because she’s essentially a stupid, ignorant foil exploited by a narcissistic and self-serving administration scared to death they’d lose an election because of their willful refusal to send aid to American diplomats under fire? Should she be held to a lower level of scrutiny because she’s a female and as such held to lower standards by a President willing to sacrifice anybody to prevent his being held accountable for his administration’s actions?
In “Senior Advisor” Dan Pfeifer’s world actual law and applicability to the topic at hand is an irrelevancy. He said more as he went hopelessly from not having a logical leg to stand on to moving his foot from his mouth to sticking it up his hindquarters with: “What I mean is that whether it's legal, or illegal is -- is not important to the fact that it -- that, the conduct as a matter. The Department of Justice said they're looking into the legality of this. The president is not going to wait for that. We have to make sure it doesn't happen again regardless of how that turns out.”
Dan, old buddy, the best way to assure “We have to make sure it doesn't happen again regardless of how that turns out” would be to learn what was evidently left out of you and Obama’s home-schooling: integrity and honesty. The lack of both leaves you and Rice looking like naked sacrifices looking to cover-up your private parts as you’re both led to the rim of the erupting volcano. There’s not much hope of escaping the burn.
Hold steady to the party line o’ great and loyal martyrs, your sacrifice will last for scandalous ages along with the Bay of Pigs, Watergate and Clinton/Lewinsky. You’ll hold the loyalty of the chief resident of the oval office until such time as he sees fit to let you drop into the lava of public scrutiny, disclosure and discovery. He’ll let you fully incinerate along with whatever integrity you thought you possessed. But, he’ll not suffer because he’s got that industrial strength sun-block you pay for with your shredded reputations.
Tools are any implements used as a means of accomplishing a task or purpose. When used figuratively of any human agency, “TOOL” is generally used in a contemptuous sense.
The blind can see the blatant abuse of the country’s collective intelligence in trying to force-feed us this hog slop the Obama’s been spreading since allowing Christopher Stevens to die because of the administration’s lack of due care and support.
Good luck. You’re going to need it.
Thanks for listening